Apr 24, 2019 Last Updated 11:27 AM, Mar 29, 2019

How to write a thorough peer review

Published in News
Read 273 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Peer reviewing is a pivotal part of scientific publication process, and it's meant to ensure that the data collected by researchers is properly scrutinized to find majour flaws or incoherences in the theory or methodology behind it. Nonetheless, nowaday, scientists receive little -if any- training in this, and most of the ability to analyze and review a scientific paper comes from raw experience. 

Mathew Stiller-Reeve wrote this quite useful vademecum that's meant to list all the majour elements that a reviewer should address as he's peer-reviewing a scientific paper.

A flow chart, that summarizes the entire process, as meant by the author, is available here

Surce: Nature Website

Last modified on Tuesday, 12 March 2019 12:47
Login to post comments

Registered area

Thanks to the support of
merck serono biogen sanofi

Conferences & Courses

17° Corso CRNI Viva la differenza: sesso e neuroimmunologia

March 7-10, 2018 
Bergamo - Bergamo Science Center


Encefaliti Autoimmuni e Malattie Demielinizzanti Atipiche

16 febbraio 2018
Aula Magna Giorgio De Sandre


JNIInternational Brain Research Organization
Bringing Neuroscience to the World
JNIJournal of Neuroimmunology
Studies on all branches of neurosciences covering both research and clinical problems of neuroscientific interest.

This website or its third party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. If you want to know more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Cookie Policy